Patient’s Corner: Living with Chronic Illness Vol. 1

By Dorothy Leon-Glasser

Chronic illness is a disease, condition, or injury that can last years or a lifetime and is typically not curable.  In some cases, it may go into remission, however for most patients it is a lifetime journey.  It can vary in its severity, with some people able to work and live a somewhat active lifestyle; while others are very sick and may even be homebound. For many people there can be long breaks between subsequent episodes of illness. No matter how frequently they experience flares of their disease, patients must continue life on a daily basis until their symptoms can be treated effectively enough to subside again.

Many people with chronic illness have an invisible disease. The severity of their symptoms is not clearly noticeable, which may lead to a lack of understanding and support from doctors, family, friends, coworkers and the public. From many years of caring for chronically ill patients, and being on my own chronic illness journey, it is a fact that ‘no one wants to feel sick’. People with chronic illness are not lazy. The truth is, chronic illness fatigue is more than what a healthy person experiences as ‘being tired’. Once fatigue kicks in, it’s as if the body “hits a wall” and can’t go further. Being chronically ill is like being on an emotional roller coaster. Chronic illness can change the biochemical makeup of the mood control center in the brain, triggering many emotions.

Just before reaching the age of 20, working as a nurse, I became seriously ill. I was unable to eat, dress myself, could barely speak and was completely bed-ridden. I felt like a huge tractor-trailer ran me over and didn’t leave a license number! I was given multiple medications and went through many clinical trials and experimental treatments. After pain-staking tests, doctor examinations, hospital admissions and years of more questions than answers, I was diagnosed. I had a serious chronic illness with a poor prognosis. Through years of much trial and error, self-awareness techniques, counseling, an exceptional health team and much support; I had a new way to live with illness and a new attitude about wellness.

Cory Lewis, Director of Red Moon Project, Sickle Cell Disease shared some challenges of living with sickle cell disease.

“Some obstacles that have been challenging while living here in Georgia is that a lot of the doctors here are still short on knowledge when it comes to sickle cell patients, the culture around sickle cell disease, and the sickle cell types; as they all tend to react and affect the patient differently.”  

Cory affirms that many sickle cell patients are:

  • Forced to look for work that offers benefits to help with medical insurance, however, a lot of these jobs that have benefits require long hours. This can cause stress in the house being away from the ones at home, making sure you don’t lose your job.
  • Constantly have to prove they have an illness, even to health professionals, that people cannot see so they deny disease severity.
  • Manage their illness and our health care system with limited resources. 
  • Face stigma and discrimination from medical team and the public who believe the patient is responsible for being sick.
  • Fight to be acknowledged as individuals each having a unique experience with unique symptoms and side effects from chronic sickle cell disease.

Cory shared his story of his emergency medical experience when he started to have symptoms of renal failure. 

“After moving to Georgia and working, I began to experience fainting and vaso-occlusion to my organs. My kidneys began to fail and my sickle cell was more sensitive than ever before. I was transported to the hospital. A doctor came into the room and automatically assumed I was drug seeking. He looked in my eyes and said ” You don’t have jaundice in your eyes; I don’t see any sickle cell”. He then politely walked out of the room. I was so surprised because I have never been told this, nor have I ever experienced this reaction from any physician. The physician did not leave any treatment orders. Fortunately, a nurse walked in with two cups of water since I was feeling dehydrated.

This was my first time on my own as a young adult tending to my illness. I was shocked to get hit with this stigma and discrimination from the medical staff.  It is not only intimidating to hear a doctor tell you that you don’t have sickle cell but disrespectful when he ignores my knowledge of my body and illness as a sickle cell patient.”

The Ga Bio Patient Advocacy Alliance wants to dispel the myths surrounding chronic illness while telling the story of our advocates who battle their own disease, even as they help others live better lives with theirs. We will be sharing the challenges of having a chronic illness and how we, as patient advocates, can help medical professionals, resources agents and the general public expand their knowledge of what it is like to successfully live with a chronic disease.

In the future, we will continue to hear from other patient advocates who work with people battling chronic illness. We can all make a difference in the lives of those who are ill by gaining a better understanding of what it means to live with a chronic illness. With more understanding of the uniqueness of symptoms and coping skills, we will help make these diseases less “invisible”.        

To learn more about Cory and The Red Moon Project, Inc. click  here  .

Dorothy Leone Glasser headshot
Dorothy Leon Glasser
Executive Director, Advocates for Responsible Care
Co-Chair, Georgia Bio Patient Advocacy Alliance
Cory Lewis
Director, Red Moon Project
By Sheran Brown June 10, 2025
June 9, 2025
By Maria Thacker Goethe May 29, 2025
 Lawmakers questioned Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on key issues like vaccines, biosecurity, and federal research funds in a week of congressional hearings about the HHS budget for 2026. Kennedy was the sole witness at a May 20 hearing of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies , and two May 14 hearings—before the Senate Health Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee and the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies . Kennedy found himself on defense over his positions on vaccines and cuts to National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. On the subject of China and biosecurity, he urged reshoring of manufacturing, noting Eli Lilly’s efforts in this area. Vaccines and measles Many questions on vaccines focused on concerns that Kennedy has not done enough to encourage vaccination in the face of ongoing measles outbreaks. During the House Appropriations hearing, Kennedy responded to a question from Rep. Mark Pocan (D-WI) about his confidence in measles vaccines, saying he would “probably” choose to vaccinate his children against measles again. “I don’t think people should be taking medical advice from me,” Kennedy added, saying they should get this advice from NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya. At the Senate HELP hearing, Democrats raised alarm over Kennedy’s stance on measles vaccines, arguing his statements eroded public trust and contradicted his confirmation hearing testimony. Ranking Member Bernie Sanders (I-VT) alleged that Kennedy undermined confidence in vaccines during a major measles outbreak. Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) raised similar concerns. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) said Kennedy’s hesitance to unequivocally endorse measles vaccines is “really dangerous for the American public and for families.” A few days later in the Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing, Kennedy gave a direct endorsement for the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. “The best way to prevent the spread of measles is through vaccination. We urge people to get their MMR vaccines,” he said. But he added that he understood why some are hesitant. “There are groups in this country that don’t want to get vaccinated, many of them for religious reasons. I spend a lot of time with the Mennonites. The MMR vaccine has millions of fragments of human DNA in it from aborted fetal tissues and that’s a religious objection for them that I have to respect,” Kennedy said. As experts have noted, there is no human DNA in MMR vaccines. The attenuated viruses in the rubella component of the vaccine are produced using a cell line obtained from the lung tissue of a single fetus in the 1960s . But those regenerated cells are only used to grow the rubella viruses, and the viruses made in this manner do not contain DNA from the human cells . Vaccines and placebo testing Other vaccine-related questions focused on Kennedy’s views about using placebos for vaccine testing. Under a new framework announced May 20, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is expected to require placebo testing for annual COVID boosters in some circumstances. During the hearings, Kennedy promoted the idea of using placebos to test vaccines. Critics of this position note the ethical problem of denying clinical trial participants protection afforded by a vaccine if they receive a placebo. “The only vaccine that has been tested in a full-blown placebo trial against an inert placebo was the COVID vaccine,” Kennedy told the HELP Committee. HELP Committee Chair Bill Cassidy, MD (R-LA) corrected this comment. “The secretary made the statement that no vaccines except for COVID have been evaluated against placebo. For the record that’s not true,” Sen. Cassidy told the hearing. “The rotavirus, measles and HPV vaccines have been, and some vaccines are tested against previous versions, so just for the record, to set that straight.” In the Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing the following week, Kennedy was asked by Sen. Brian Schatz (D-HI) if he believed vaccines that are already approved need to be retested using placebo trials. “I don’t think it’s ethical to go back and retest those vaccines with a placebo,” Kennedy said. “The Cochrane Collaboration in 2016 published a study that showed that the predictive capacity of placebo control trials, which are the gold standard, is actually not any better than good observational trials and retrospective trials. So we can do those kinds of studies without subjecting people to an unethical experiment.” NSCEB and biosecurity Kennedy was also asked to address the findings of the recently released report by the Congressional National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology (NSCEB) . Created by Congress in the 2022 defense budget, the NSCEB in April released its report warning that China’s strategic spending on biotech R&D increased 400-fold in the last decade as they seek to eclipse U.S. dominance in the field. If the U.S. falls behind, it has serious implications for our national security and health, the report warned. In the House Appropriations subcommittee , Rep. John Moolenaar (R-MI) mentioned the report and asked whether Kennedy saw overreliance on China for biotech as a threat. Kennedy responded that China is stealing U.S. IP and technology and claimed NIH has enabled this IP theft. Kennedy said it is important to bring drug production home to the U.S. and noted drug makers are beginning to do that. “I’ve met repeatedly with Eli Lilly, which is now building nine facilities, nine factories, in this country, including for essential medicines (and) the essential ingredients for those medicines.” In the Senate HELP hearing later that day, Sen. Jim Banks (R-IN) asked for an update on efforts to reshore drug manufacturing from China to the U.S. Kennedy again mentioned Eli Lilly’s efforts to build production facilities in the U.S. and said movement toward reshoring has been encouraged by President Trump’s threats of tariffs on pharmaceutical companies. Concerns about NIH funding There was clear concern about the impact that budget cuts to the NIH would have on biomedical research and the innovation that brings us new drugs. Lawmakers in all three hearings pushed back on Kennedy’s claims that the NIH is beset by corruption, that NIH cuts are focused on DEI programs rather than research, and that AI will enable the same number of clinical trials to continue despite cutbacks. In the Senate HELP committee, Chair Cassidy warned that NIH budget reductions would impair capacity for crucial research on neurodegenerative diseases, hinder the development of new scientists, and undermine U.S. competitiveness with China. Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) detailed a constituent’s delayed stage-four cancer treatment at the NIH Clinical Center due to staff firings and demanded that Kennedy supply information on specific number of staff cuts. Kennedy acknowledged NIH staff cuts would “hurt” but called them necessary. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) criticized the NIH’s proposed 15% cap on indirect research costs, calling it arbitrary, harmful to research, and likely to drive scientists abroad. She asked if Secretary Kennedy was evaluating its impact on laboratories. Kennedy said a review was underway. Voicing a similar sentiment In the House Appropriations Committee, Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) said China and Europe are taking advantage of the firings of nearly 5,000 employees at NIH by recruiting American scientists. As she opened the Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing, Subcommittee Chair Shelley Moore Capito (R-WVA) underlined the importance of the NIH. “NIH-funded basic research is also behind many of the 600+ new cancer treatments the FDA has approved over the last 20 years,” and other important breakthroughs, Capito said. ‘I am concerned that our country is falling behind in biomedical research,” she added. “Investing in biomedical research has proven to save lives while exponentially strengthening the U.S. economy.” Author: Tom Popper is the Managing Editor of Bio.News.
By Sheran Brown May 15, 2025
Georgia Life Sciences Designates Augusta as Newest BioReady® Community
MORE POSTS