Looking back on a year of growth and ahead to a year of opportunity: our Q&A with Georgia Bio Chair Patty Fritz

Patty Fritz, UCB Vice President, U.S. Corporate Affairs, presided as chair of Georgia Bio during its 30th anniversary year. Looking back on advancements in Georgia’s life sciences industry in 2019 and ahead to what 2020 may hold, she recently shared her thoughts with us. We are pleased to share them with you in the following Q&A.

Q: How would you characterize 2019 for the Georgia life science industry?Patty Fritz headshot

A: This has been an exciting year of growth for the Georgia life sciences industry. In Georgia Bio’s 30th anniversary year, the organization’s transformation is reflective of the life sciences in Georgia as a whole. I think about all of the rich pieces of the puzzle we enjoy here. Georgia is home to leading academic research institutions, startups, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, entrepreneurs along with robust biotech, medical device, pharma, digital, and global health industries.

Global health has risen to a top growth opportunity for the state. This year made clear to us that policy makers and state officials recognize the importance of the life science industry’s contribution to improving lives, economic growth, and opportunities for the future.

Q: What were the most encouraging ecosystem developments this year?

A: Our state of the industry report released in April shows the life science industry contributes to 3.7% of total employment in the state and $21.8 billion to the state’s gross domestic product. We are very encouraged by, and thankful for recognition of the industry’s value and importance by the governor, lieutenant governor, and policymakers. The appropriation of state funding for Georgia Bio’s Rural Teacher Training Initiative is one very specific example of this recognition. It serves the interest of furthering our ability to support STEM education and cultivate Georgia’s future workforce in the life sciences.

Q: What do you think 2020 will bring to the ecosystem?

A: I think we will see the industry continue its growth trajectory in 2020. The support of our policymakers and communities to attract and incentivize investment in the life sciences will help more startups grow. It will also encourage future investment in expansion by more established organizations like UCB, Takeda, and Boehringer-Ingelheim and others with existing presence in the state. All of the work at UCB that is done right here in Georgia is aimed at developing medical advancements and interventions for people with severe diseases.

Q: What would you encourage your colleagues – or incoming board chair for example – to make priorities in 2020?

STEM classroom with teacher and students

A: Continue to support workforce preparedness through STEM education programming and our research ecosystem. We all need to continue to grow our collective engagement with policymakers. We need to ensure incentives are available to grow and contribute more to the state’s economy. Strengthen your connections between life science ecosystem stakeholders. This supports our need to amplify our impact and opportunity to cultivate and grow a sustainable ecosystem of innovation..

Q: What have you learned during your time as Georgia Bio Chair?

A: Serving as Georgia Bio Chair has helped me recognize how valuable the resources and impact of the community are right here at home. I thought I knew prior to becoming chair, but this experience has given me a better understanding of just what we have here in our own backyard. The leadership of Georgia Bio and other life science organizations here, like the Georgia Global Health Alliance, is very strong.

In my experience, I have found consistently that the goals amongst the life sciences industry leaders are incredibly high. And given the ingredients to support those leaders and those organizations, those goals are achievable.

I would also have to say that the Georgia life sciences has a unique strength that extends beyond the borders of Georgia and even the United States, and that is our ability to lead in the global health ecosystem. I reflect on the presence of the Center for Disease Control and the Georgia Global Health Alliance, just to mention a couple.

We also benefit from a thriving health technology and specifically digital health industry that is growing and having an even greater role in healthcare and in medical innovation.

Overall, we have enormous capability to come together with a shared vision and roadmap for advancing the life sciences and its positive patient impacts in Georgia and beyond. To get there requires us to come together, be intentional and clear about what we want to do, how we’re going to do it, and hold ourselves accountable to deliver.

Q: Who would you like to thank?

A: I want to thank Maria Thacker-Goethe for her leadership. She took on her new role during a year of transition and has done tremendous work. She is a thread between many organizations in the ecosystem and community, balancing their needs along with Georgia Bio’s in order to continue to move us ahead. I thank the Georgia Bio Executive Committee which has been instrumental in supporting her and serving as an important part of the fabric that binds the ecosystem together. I want to thank my own company, UCB, not just for its commitment to our own mission, its impact and value, but for being vibrant contributor to Georgia’s health economy. And I especially thank my family for allowing me to dedicate so much time and work to UCB and the state.

Q: Is there anything else you’d like to share?

We have a leading role to play as an accelerant to amplify the impact of innovative digital health and health tech companies in Georgia like Sharecare, Patientory, and others. They do not live alongside the life sciences industry as traditionally defined, they are interwoven within it. The life sciences industry is more than ever an integrated set of capabilities. Data collected from patients is essential in delivering real world insight into patient experiences, gaps and needs. Aggregating large data sets to which we would not normally have access enable us to learn more about what’s working and what’s not more quickly to inform our research. That research brings better interventions for patients in the future. It’s all connected. We use AI to understand patient populations most likely to be responsive to certain treatments, address unmet needs and bring new therapies to patients.

Thank you, Patty for your service as Georgia Bio Chair and for your insights!

June 17, 2026
As part of the Georgia Life Sciences Summit (August 25–26), applications are now open for the Startup Showcase , sponsored by Johnson & Johnson , highlighting early-stage innovation across MedTech and Therapeutics . The Showcase will feature some of Georgia’s most innovative life science startups, giving emerging companies the opportunity to present groundbreaking technologies, products, and solutions to a distinguished audience of industry leaders, investors, researchers, and partners. Selected startups will present during the August 26 luncheon program and participate in a live investor Q&A session with John Gutierrez (Ascenta Capital), Emma Heckenberg, Ph.D. (Solas BioVentures), Patrick Jordan (NovaQuest Capital Management), and Emily Dinu (Numinous Capital) Members of the Johnson & Johnson external innovation team will also be onsite for the program and select companies will be scheduled for a 1:1 meeting to discuss strategic alignment and potential collaboration opportunities. If you or companies in your network are building in MedTech or Therapeutics, this is a strong opportunity to gain visibility, receive feedback on commercialization and growth strategy, and connect with key stakeholders. All applicants receive a complimentary Summit registration, and one selected company will also be invited to participate in the NewYorkBIO / New York Stock Exchange Life Sciences Showcase on December 10. If this is relevant to your work, it would be a strong opportunity to consider applying. If not, it may be worth sharing with companies in your network who are building in this space.
June 15, 2026
Workforce & Education Impact: Building Georgia's Future  Life Sciences Workforce - One Teacher at a Time June 16, 2026 - As Georgia Life Sciences concludes the 2025-2026 cycle of the Biotech Teacher Training Initiative (BTTI), the results reinforce the critical role educators play in building the state's future life sciences workforce. Since July of 2025, BTTI engaged 98 educators representing 40 schools across 23 school systems, reaching an estimated 5,375 students through hands-on biotechnology instruction, career-connected learning, and industry-relevant classroom experiences. The Georgia Life Sciences Equipment Depot further expanded the program's impact by supporting 238 teachers with access to laboratory equipment and materials that make authentic life sciences learning possible. Georgia Life Sciences is also pleased to report that funding for BTTI was maintained in the Georgia House version of the FY 2027 budget approved earlier this year. The upcoming 2026-2027 program cycle will mark an important evolution for BTTI. Building on feedback from industry partners and workforce trends across the life sciences sector, Georgia Life Sciences will expand the program's scope to better reflect the skills and competencies employers increasingly need. In addition to foundational biotechnology concepts, future programming will be organized around key industry domains, including Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC), Research & Development (R&D), MedTech, Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and Advanced Manufacturing. This expanded approach will provide educators with greater insight into the breadth of career opportunities available across Georgia's life sciences ecosystem while helping students develop awareness of the technologies and disciplines shaping the industry's future. The impact extends far beyond individual workshops, creating lasting connections between Georgia classrooms and the state's growing life sciences ecosystem while helping build the talent pipeline that will power Georgia's future innovation economy. "Before BTTI, I was hesitant to do biotech labs because they seemed too complex and expensive," shared Josephine Jeganathan of Stockbridge High School. "The program showed me how simplified it can be and provided the equipment and materials needed to successfully implement the Central Dogma Lab with all my classes." Teachers are also seeing increased student engagement through hands-on learning experiences. Tonie Curry of North Clayton High School used a chromatography lab to connect environmental science concepts to water pollution and sustainability. "Students were highly interested in seeing how substances separated and made strong connections to water pollution and environmental sustainability," Curry noted. "The hands-on nature of the lab encouraged curiosity and deeper understanding." For many educators, one of the most valuable aspects of the program is the connection between classroom learning and real-world careers. As Marshai Waiters of Marietta Middle School reflected: "Exposure is key. There are so many avenues to work in STEM, and they are all accessible with opportunity and knowledge. The insights gained from industry speakers will inform my teaching and create new opportunities for student exposure." When teachers are trained, equipped, and connected to industry, students gain more than a science lesson—they gain a window into Georgia's life sciences future.
June 10, 2026
In recent comments to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC), PULSE highlighted critical reforms to ensure that U.S. competition policies support – and do not impede – the pro-competitive mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and other collaborations that drive American life sciences innovation. PULSE submitted comments in response to two joint DOJ/FTC Requests related to Guidance on Collaborations Among Competitors and Improvements to the Premerger Notification and Report Form (HSR Form). Read below for key takeaways from PULSE’s comment letters: 1. Life Sciences Innovation Depends on Collaboration “At its core, life sciences innovation is overwhelmingly collaborative. The cutting-edge medicines and cures developed by America’s life sciences industry are rarely the result of just one sole actor. Instead, they more often emerge from a calibrated sequence of partnerships… that collectively usher a biomedical breakthrough from early-stage discovery to FDA approval and delivery to patients.” – PULSE, Comments on Guidance on Collaborations Among Competitors 2. Policies that Ignore the Fundamental Role of Life Sciences M&A Risk Chilling Innovation for Patients “Against the significant challenges and pressures inherent to life sciences innovation, such policies that needlessly delay pro-competitive transactions have significant ripple effects: eroded investment incentives, disruptions in the path to launch and, ultimately, slowed or stalled development of new treatments and cures for patients.” – PULSE, Comments on Improvements to the HSR Form 3. Clear, Predictable Standards Can Support Competition and Innovation in America’s Life Sciences Ecosystem “Preserving clear and workable pathways for collaboration is therefore essential to sustain the broader ecosystem that delivers innovation and sustains America’s status as the world leader in life sciences innovation.” – PULSE, Comments on Guidance on Collaborations Among Competitors Leading business and industry organizations echoed and reinforced these priorities. Their comments highlight the unique market dynamics of life sciences innovation and the importance of collaboration and M&A – particularly with respect to early-stage R&D. “Because drug development typically takes over a decade, and the vast majority of drugs in development never make it to market, the antitrust risks associated with R&D collaborations in this space may be less than with other R&D collaborations.” – ABA Antitrust Law Section, Comments on Guidance on Collaborations Among Competitors “In the biopharmaceutical sector, for instance, R&D ventures in the pre-clinical or Phase I stages should be presumed lawful. At these early stages, about 90% of drugs never make it to market, so these collaborations are far too distant from commercialization to pose a meaningful threat to competition.” – U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Comments on Guidance for Collaborations Among Competitors “Healthy M&A activity also aids company formation and capital raising earlier in a business’s life cycle, as entrepreneurs and early-stage investors often depend on M&A for an exit opportunity. Conversely, discouraging business combinations by imposing burdensome one-size-fits-all standards on all transactions, like those imposed by the 2024 amendments, would disincentivize early-stage innovation and slow down economic growth.” – National Association of Manufacturers, Comments on Improvements to the HSR Form The bottom line: A balanced approach to antitrust enforcement policy should support life sciences M&A and other collaborations, ensuring new medicines continue to reach patients, while preserving a diverse and collaborative ecosystem. PULSE urges the agencies to adopt clear, workable and predictable standards that companies can apply with confidence. That includes preserving enforcement safety zones for low-risk, pro-competitive collaborations, as well as ensuring the HSR Form facilitates a timely, focused and fit-for-purpose screening process for life sciences M&A deals. Click below to read PULSE’s full comments: PULSE Comments on Guidelines on Collaborations Among Competitors PULSE Comments on Improvements to the HSR Form Source: PULSE Urges FTC, DOJ to Support Pro-Competitive Life Sciences Collaborations and M&A - Partnership for the U.S. Life Science Ecosystem (PULSE)
MORE POSTS