Dr. Ted W. Love: How to reframe the narrative about biotech – and put patients first

November 2, 2023 /  Source BIO News

Mainstage at the GA Life Sciences Summit

Remarks from Dr. Ted W. Love, Chairman of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) and former President and CEO of Global Blood Therapeutics, as prepared for delivery Georgia Bio’s Life Sciences Summit on November 1, 2023:

Almost ten years ago, when our college-aged daughter Alex lived at home, I had a difficult time convincing her that our industry was a force for good. We talked a lot about the biopharma industry, and I felt like I was living with Bernie Sanders!

So one day I asked her, “Would you work at  Global Blood Therapeutics  for the summer and help us build our patient advocacy initiative?” She did, and she saw everything that we do – internally, externally, and in partnership with patient advocates.

She saw first-hand that the patients were our inspiration and drove how we approached every issue. She saw  our passion to conquer sickle cell disease , particularly because it had been historically overlooked and under-invested in. She embraced our motto that “we can’t fail because patients are dying!”

Alex had a great experience that summer. In fact, many patient advocates continue to ask me, “How is Alex?” Before she went back to school, Alex told me that she was wrong about our industry. She said, “I never imaged a collection of people working so hard, singularly focused on helping others!” Needless to say, I was proud of her and of our industry…in addition to feeling a little victorious.

How to reframe the narrative about the biotech industry

I think every parent here knows that it can be very hard to change your child’s mind. And heaven knows we’re still working on Bernie Sanders. But perhaps we can learn a lesson from my experience with Alex when it comes to re-framing the narrative of our industry.

I would like to remind us that 35 years ago, Fortune Magazine named  Merck  as the country’s Most Admired Company repeatedly. Yet these days, similar surveys are far less appreciative of our great companies. Frankly, it’s unacceptable to me that our industry, which develops amazing breakthroughs that save countless lives, is viewed so inconsistently.

Sadly, the public does not see the tremendous work, risk, and commitment required to bring innovations to them. This is a huge and unfortunate disconnect. And while image may not be everything, it can be – and has been – hugely consequential for us. It’s long past time to reframe our narrative to better reflect the facts!

For Ted Love, biotech is personal

Mainstage at the Georgia Life Sciences Summit

This is a personal campaign for me. I grew up in Alabama, and the Jim Crow South. I was one of eight children growing up on a farm, and my parents worked hard to provide us with opportunities that they never had.

My father had a fourth-grade education, fought in the Korean War, and worked in a warehouse to support us. My mother held down our house, which was quite an undertaking with five boys and three girls.

I learned so much from my parents, but I was also inspired by the doctor in our segregated community. I decided that I too wanted to be a physician and help others, just as he helped us.

Years later, working at Mass General Hospital in Boston, I saw how medical innovations drastically improved lives. Yet I also witnessed drugs and therapies failing to reach a segment of our society.

It was disappointing, embarrassing, even horrifying to see how the healthcare system could mistreat people of color and the most vulnerable. I’ll never forget watching sickle cell patients endure egregious discrimination and unsympathetic healthcare. Ultimately, my personal experiences, coupled with sage advice from mentors, convinced me to accept a position at Genentech when it was a much smaller and riskier company, to try and impact health care at scale. And that’s what we do every day.

‘Biotechnology is our only hope’

Showing the public how we change lives through innovations is a huge task that we must all embrace! But, we can do this by telling everyone we talk to about biotechnology is our only hope – to fight egregious diseases and future pandemics, to produce clean energy to fight climate change, to solve  food insecurity , and  to provide biodefense to keep us all secure.

We need to increase awareness of what we are achieving in our society, by telling our powerful stories of innovation and standing up for science.

It will require highlighting  the possibilities of mRNA vaccinesgene therapycrop editing , and the many other amazing technologies that we are investing in.

It will require highlighting both the opportunities and uncertainties of the innovation ecosystem, making it clear that the Inflation Reduction Act  threatens our ability to deliver new, life-saving innovations.

Most of all, it will require building on our work to increase access.

I joined Global Blood Therapeutics because I never forgot the suffering of the sickle cell patients that I saw as a medical student and young physician. We developed  Oxbryta  as a breakthrough to attack the root cause of this insidious fatal disease. And last year,  Pfizer acquired GBT to accelerate delivery of our innovative therapies  to more patients around the world, particularly in Africa, India, and South America.

Helping to build GBT is one of the greatest achievements of my life. Yet ensuring that these therapies benefit the greatest number of people around the world will be my proudest.

As an industry, how we support our patient communities is critical. When it’s done well, we are appreciated and often treasured.

When sickle cell patients and advocates learned of GBT’s acquisition by Pfizer, the response was emotional. It was like losing a member of their family. But the community also saw the big picture, and the possibility that Pfizer could accelerate the transformation of a long-neglected disease.

They knew that they would remain at the center of what we do.

Why it’s time to elevate the biotech industry’s voice

Re-framing our industry’s narrative and increasing access to our innovations go together, and they have been my top priorities since I became Chair of BIO.

A third priority is helping to elevate the industry voice at the federal, state, and international levels. Here in Georgia, you have the excellent leadership of Maria [Thacker-Goethe] and Georgia Bio. As Chair of the Council of State Bioscience Associations – better known as CSBA – Maria works closely with BIO on a host of policy priorities.

Together, we are fighting to  restore the immediate full R&D tax credit so small and mid-sized biotech have more capital. The economic environment is critical for biotech, which is why we are also pushing back on problematic provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act.

These are provisions that reduced incentives, and will limit our ability to bring new therapies and innovations forward. If unaddressed, they will result in fewer drugs and innovations to help our patients and society.

Here in Georgia, your focus on talent development, personalized medicine, and the role of artificial intelligence are critical to ensuring a strong and diverse industry for years to come.

I urge every one of you to participate in our important advocacy work. But I also want you to think big. The mRNA breakthrough took years but arrived in time for COVID. We should all ask ourselves, “What nascent research is happening right now that will be critical and lifesaving tomorrow?”

Biotech is about seeking new opportunities and turning dreams into reality. We must stay true to these principles, while keeping patients and society as our North Star. That will redefine belief in science and biotech.

‘Put patients and our society first’

Lastly, on a more personal note, I want to thank the health community here for your commitment to fighting sickle cell. I came out of retirement to fight this terrible disease, which has affected so many African American families.

One extraordinary person that I so admire is  Mapillar Dahn , who I’m sure many of you know here in the Atlanta region. Mapillar gave birth to three beautiful girls, all with sickle cell. She became a leading advocate for sickle cell research and founded the MTS Sickle Cell Foundation. It brings me incredible joy knowing that our work at GBT has helped her daughters lead healthier and happier lives.

We all must be leaders like Mapillar – and so many of you are. My ask to each of you is to take a piece of our challenge back home with you. Put patients and our society first, and make sure we define our narrative. If we do, we will create a more prosperous and sustainable society for all.

Thank you.

By Maria Thacker Goethe August 1, 2025
As Washington heads into August recess, Georgia Life Sciences is counting down the days to the 2025 Georgia Life Sciences Summit , taking place August 26–27 in Sandy Springs . With just one month to go, this pivotal gathering will bring together innovators, investors, policymakers, and ecosystem leaders at a time when the national policy landscape is shifting rapidly—and not always in our favor. In just the past week, we’ve seen: A short-lived but deeply disruptive pause in NIH funding : The White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) temporarily halted the issuance of NIH research grants, contracts, and training awards—impacting institutions nationwide, including here in Georgia. After significant backlash from Congress, research leaders, and advocacy groups, the administration quickly reversed course and released the funds. However, this episode underscores the growing unpredictability of federal research funding—one of the lifelines for our academic and startup ecosystem. The return of pharmaceutical tariffs : The administration announced a 15% tariff on European pharmaceutical imports , though it will not take effect until a national security review is completed. While far lower than the previously floated 200% rate, this move still poses a concern for supply chains and U.S. companies relying on EU-based manufacturing. Escalating pressure on drug pricing : President Trump has now issued direct letters to CEOs of 17 major pharmaceutical companies demanding implementation of Most Favored Nation (MFN) pricing within 60 days. The directive includes MFN pricing for all existing Medicaid drugs, future Medicare and commercial launches, and even repatriation of foreign revenues. While regulatory specifics remain vague, the message is clear: the administration is increasing its pressure on pricing reform—and that could have broad implications for biotech innovation, particularly among smaller companies. At the same time, a new BIO report shows that early-stage biotech funding continues to contract. Series A investment remains flat, IPOs are sluggish, and Q2 startup funding dropped to just $900 million—down from $2.6 billion in Q1. Layoffs across the sector have surged. This paints a sobering picture for many companies in Georgia and beyond. In this environment, Georgia Life Sciences remains committed to elevating our state’s voice, regionally and nationally . We continue to advocate for stable federal funding, smart policies, and the resources innovators need to survive and thrive. The Georgia Life Sciences Summit will be a platform to do just that, demonstrating the resilience of our ecosystem, celebrating homegrown successes, and shaping the future of health innovation in Georgia. I hope to see you there.
By Maria Thacker Goethe July 28, 2025
By: Clary Estes “Small companies are the lifeblood of the industry and a lot of what they do, and what they’re experiencing, greatly affects the industry as a whole,” said Chad Wessel, Director of Industry Analysis at the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO). He spoke with Bio.News in an interview about BIO’s 2025 report, “ The State of Emerging Biotech Companies: Investment, Deal, and Pipeline Trends ,” focused on the biotech industry from the early-stage perspective. As researchers found, the current landscape is challenging, but there are still opportunities. “In the last couple years, we’ve had a little bit of a contraction of the industry. During COVID, we kind of had this sugar rush for the industry,” said Wessel. “A lot of companies were being created. A lot of money was being thrown out there. A lot more companies were being funded. And in the last couple of years, there has been a little bit more of a correction, and we’re seeing funding levels going down to what we’ve seen prior to COVID.” “But when you add on other challenges, like the political landscape and everything, it is leaning towards a very challenging environment for a lot of companies,” he continued. Bearish venture capital “In venture capital, yes, you have a lot of money, but it’s going to fewer companies at higher average amounts,” explained Wessel. “It’s creating this competitive haves and have-nots type marketplace or environment. So it just makes it a lot more competitive and more challenging to raise funds.” Instead of finding new opportunities, venture capitalists are investing more in companies they are already working with. As the BIO report found, the amount of new series A-1 investment rounds into biopharma remained flat between 2023 and 2024, while the number of U.S. companies receiving their first series A-1 tranche went from 102 to 100. This is in comparison to 181 in 2021, reflecting the COVID influx to emerging biotechs. Comparatively, as the BIO report found, the average amount for A-1 transactions in the U.S. saw a remarkable increase of 700% in the last 15 years, with the average amount raised sitting at $60 million in 2024. The rest of the world stayed relatively steady in comparison to the U.S.’s persistent growth. And with the more bearish tendencies of investors, Wessel and team observed an interesting trend. “2024 was the first year that clinical programs actually raised more venture dollars than pre-clinical, which hasn’t happened in a while,” said Wessel. “I think the last time that happened was in 2018. This ties into some of the information that we’ve heard anecdotally, which is that a lot of VC firms are focusing on the companies that they currently have in their portfolio, rather than adding new companies.” Licensing and deals dip It is not too surprising, then, that as investors shore up what they already have in the pipelines, the R&D pipeline and licensing have slowed somewhat. As the BIO report observed, long-term growth in the R&D pipeline continues with an overall growth of 145% since 2010. Yet, the 2024 expansion rate (4.6%) subsided slightly, trailing the 5-year average of 6.7%. “The growth has slowed on new programs, and more of those programs are being licensed with larger companies,” explained Wessel. “There are fewer options for big companies to backfill their pipeline with products because a lot of them are already out.” The data also shows a notable slowing of the R&D typically done by large biopharma companies. “The areas that are not licensed out as much are the ones with some of the higher patient populations and subsequently the ones that are not being run by small companies,” said Wessel. “These are areas like endocrine and cardiovascular diseases, which are areas where there are a lot of things like type 2 diabetes, psoriasis , high blood pressure, etc. Those all have a lot of burden on the healthcare sector or the patient population, and those aren’t really being worked on that much by smaller companies.” Comparatively – and also not surprisingly – oncology has stayed at the top of the clinical pipeline, along with neurology and infectious disease. “Same thing with licensing,” said Wessel. “While there are deals that are still happening, the upfront amount is lower currently than it has been in years past, and most of the value is tied up into milestone payments, which may or may not happen.” This is also being felt when it comes to new companies going public, which has been an oft-discussed challenge in the biotech industry for the last few years. “The IPO market has still been challenging,” Wessel says. “We went from having 40 companies a year going public, down to 15 in 2023, and now we’re back up in 2025, but it’s still down from the pre-COVID era timeframe.” Biopharma layoffs Another notable characteristic of this year’s biopharma landscape has been uptick in layoffs. “Sometimes it’s just the nature of the economy. But the amount that we’ve seen in the last few years is quite a bit higher,” said Wessel. “To counter that, we don’t really have a way of measuring job creation, but we do know it’s happening. We just are unable to put a value on that.” The BIO report found that layoff announcements ticked up to 65 during Q1 of 2025. While two points lower than Q1 of the previous year, this still marks a jump from 2024’s Q2, Q3, and Q4, which saw the number of layoff announcements at 41, 54, and 46, respectively. All in all, Wessel noted, the biotech industry is still in a bit of a holding period when it comes to trying to navigate the coming months. “It’s too early to be able to say much about the coming years for the industry based on these numbers,” he said. “It takes a little time for reality to kind of catch up for multiple reasons. But what I can say is that we do know that companies are reducing their pipelines. We do know that companies are laying off individuals. We do know that companies are having a challenge of raising funds and continue doing their best to try to maintain operations as long as they can until they can get funds.” “We know the challenge is out there, but we’re going to have to kind of wait and see a little bit on the data side of things to understand how everything is going to catch up going forward.” Source: https://bio.news/bioeconomy/bio-2025-state-of-emerging-biotechs-report-market-trends/?mkt_tok=NDkwLUVIWi05OTkAAAGb7m5php-rTOf0a_GTaj5pj7Zl-HlpVM25WtyVvCYudM82a9GKjoazUg9sqU66hlAbhqbEuYvcX3C4EqfBG7Q
By Maria Thacker Goethe July 26, 2025
Pioneer Institute has released updated #340B state fact sheets for 2025
MORE POSTS