Georgia Life Sciences: Growth, Investment, and Future Potential

Hypepotamus: Georgia Life Sciences: Growth, Investment, and Future Potential

Maija Ehlinger: February 14, 2025

Georgia Life Sciences: Growth, Investment, and Future Potential - Hypepotamus




For the last 35 years, Georgia Bio, the state’s main advocacy and business leadership organization, has worked to support pharmaceuticals, biotech startups, medical device companies, universities, research institutes, and government groups who are growing in the Peach State.


The organization recently announced a rebrand with its new name, Georgia Life Sciences. The name better reflects the organization’s “renewed focus and support” for the state’s growing life sciences community, CEO Maria Thacker Goethe told Hypepotamus.

 


The State of Life Sciences In Georgia


Close to 4,000 life sciences companies are building in the State of Georgia currently, and the industry is the “highest paying and fastest growing [sector] in the state,” according to Thacker Goethe.


“Georgia’s sizable, fast-growing, and high paying life sciences sector is critical to our economic growth. Surrounding states, and beyond, have prioritized and continue to invest in life sciences for many reasons, in large part because relative to other industrial sectors, the extended domestic supply chain of the U.S. industrial bioeconomy generates outsized secondary economic benefits,” she added. “The industry provides a strong mix of scientific and production jobs providing varied employment opportunities, and the biggest gap in the sector’s workforce require a technical degree or even some basic certifications out of high school. Life sciences is a very large sector that encompasses human health but also industrial bioproducts, biofuels, biofeedstocks, medical devices, and much more. According to BIO’s 2024 Economic Impact study, Georgia is in the top 10 states for this sector, and if we can make some progress to grow economic incentives and train our workforce, we will continue to be a leader.”


Georgia’s growing success in the life sciences stems from the state’s academic research institutions, substantial corporate investment, and strategic economic development initiatives.“Georgia is becoming a critical player in biopharma manufacturing,” Thacker Goethe told Hypepotamus, highlighting the presence of industry giants like Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Johnson & Johnson.


She also pointed to the state’s expanding medical device and diagnostics sectors, thanks to close collaborations with research powerhouses like Georgia Tech and Emory University. The state’s agricultural roots also provide fertile ground for the ‘agbio’ sector, with institutions like the University of Georgia conducting new research in precision agriculture and crop resilience.


When asked to describe the state of the life sciences’ community in Georgia, Thacker Goethe emphasized the state’s potential in becoming a hub for regenerative medicine companies, smart medical devices, and CDMOs (Contract Development and Manufacturing Organizations).


“With increasing demand for renewable materials and biofuels, Georgia’s industrial biotech sector should expand rapidly, leveraging its agricultural strengths and infrastructure. Breakthroughs in CRISPR-based crop modifications may drive Georgia’s role in creating resilient, high-yield crops to combat climate change and food security challenges,” she added.



Potential For Local Growth


But challenges remain.


Access to capital is a primary concern. While venture capital is increasing, securing adequate funding for life sciences startups can be difficult. Thacker Goethe pointed out the need for more wet-lab spaces, incubators, and biomanufacturing facilities to accommodate growing companies. She also warned that neighboring states are making targeted investments in life sciences and could potentially narrow the gap.


“One challenge we are working to address: building a community coalition to establish a Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) matching grants program in Georgia. We are the only state in the southeast that does not have this program (Alabama established theirs a couple of years ago),” she added. “The federal SBIR/STTR program provides early funding for research and development. However, these grants often don’t cover later-stage activities like prototyping, manufacturing, regulatory approvals, or market entry. State matching programs provide the additional capital needed to help startups move beyond research and into product development and commercialization, enabling companies to bring innovative solutions to market faster. We will lose Georgia-grown innovations to others states if we are unable to adopt a matching program.”


National headwinds can also hamper industry growth, according to a recent statement Georgia Life Sciences published around the recent National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidance to limit funding for medical and life sciences research at universities. 

You can read the full statement here.


By Maria Thacker Goethe July 28, 2025
By: Clary Estes “Small companies are the lifeblood of the industry and a lot of what they do, and what they’re experiencing, greatly affects the industry as a whole,” said Chad Wessel, Director of Industry Analysis at the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO). He spoke with Bio.News in an interview about BIO’s 2025 report, “ The State of Emerging Biotech Companies: Investment, Deal, and Pipeline Trends ,” focused on the biotech industry from the early-stage perspective. As researchers found, the current landscape is challenging, but there are still opportunities. “In the last couple years, we’ve had a little bit of a contraction of the industry. During COVID, we kind of had this sugar rush for the industry,” said Wessel. “A lot of companies were being created. A lot of money was being thrown out there. A lot more companies were being funded. And in the last couple of years, there has been a little bit more of a correction, and we’re seeing funding levels going down to what we’ve seen prior to COVID.” “But when you add on other challenges, like the political landscape and everything, it is leaning towards a very challenging environment for a lot of companies,” he continued. Bearish venture capital “In venture capital, yes, you have a lot of money, but it’s going to fewer companies at higher average amounts,” explained Wessel. “It’s creating this competitive haves and have-nots type marketplace or environment. So it just makes it a lot more competitive and more challenging to raise funds.” Instead of finding new opportunities, venture capitalists are investing more in companies they are already working with. As the BIO report found, the amount of new series A-1 investment rounds into biopharma remained flat between 2023 and 2024, while the number of U.S. companies receiving their first series A-1 tranche went from 102 to 100. This is in comparison to 181 in 2021, reflecting the COVID influx to emerging biotechs. Comparatively, as the BIO report found, the average amount for A-1 transactions in the U.S. saw a remarkable increase of 700% in the last 15 years, with the average amount raised sitting at $60 million in 2024. The rest of the world stayed relatively steady in comparison to the U.S.’s persistent growth. And with the more bearish tendencies of investors, Wessel and team observed an interesting trend. “2024 was the first year that clinical programs actually raised more venture dollars than pre-clinical, which hasn’t happened in a while,” said Wessel. “I think the last time that happened was in 2018. This ties into some of the information that we’ve heard anecdotally, which is that a lot of VC firms are focusing on the companies that they currently have in their portfolio, rather than adding new companies.” Licensing and deals dip It is not too surprising, then, that as investors shore up what they already have in the pipelines, the R&D pipeline and licensing have slowed somewhat. As the BIO report observed, long-term growth in the R&D pipeline continues with an overall growth of 145% since 2010. Yet, the 2024 expansion rate (4.6%) subsided slightly, trailing the 5-year average of 6.7%. “The growth has slowed on new programs, and more of those programs are being licensed with larger companies,” explained Wessel. “There are fewer options for big companies to backfill their pipeline with products because a lot of them are already out.” The data also shows a notable slowing of the R&D typically done by large biopharma companies. “The areas that are not licensed out as much are the ones with some of the higher patient populations and subsequently the ones that are not being run by small companies,” said Wessel. “These are areas like endocrine and cardiovascular diseases, which are areas where there are a lot of things like type 2 diabetes, psoriasis , high blood pressure, etc. Those all have a lot of burden on the healthcare sector or the patient population, and those aren’t really being worked on that much by smaller companies.” Comparatively – and also not surprisingly – oncology has stayed at the top of the clinical pipeline, along with neurology and infectious disease. “Same thing with licensing,” said Wessel. “While there are deals that are still happening, the upfront amount is lower currently than it has been in years past, and most of the value is tied up into milestone payments, which may or may not happen.” This is also being felt when it comes to new companies going public, which has been an oft-discussed challenge in the biotech industry for the last few years. “The IPO market has still been challenging,” Wessel says. “We went from having 40 companies a year going public, down to 15 in 2023, and now we’re back up in 2025, but it’s still down from the pre-COVID era timeframe.” Biopharma layoffs Another notable characteristic of this year’s biopharma landscape has been uptick in layoffs. “Sometimes it’s just the nature of the economy. But the amount that we’ve seen in the last few years is quite a bit higher,” said Wessel. “To counter that, we don’t really have a way of measuring job creation, but we do know it’s happening. We just are unable to put a value on that.” The BIO report found that layoff announcements ticked up to 65 during Q1 of 2025. While two points lower than Q1 of the previous year, this still marks a jump from 2024’s Q2, Q3, and Q4, which saw the number of layoff announcements at 41, 54, and 46, respectively. All in all, Wessel noted, the biotech industry is still in a bit of a holding period when it comes to trying to navigate the coming months. “It’s too early to be able to say much about the coming years for the industry based on these numbers,” he said. “It takes a little time for reality to kind of catch up for multiple reasons. But what I can say is that we do know that companies are reducing their pipelines. We do know that companies are laying off individuals. We do know that companies are having a challenge of raising funds and continue doing their best to try to maintain operations as long as they can until they can get funds.” “We know the challenge is out there, but we’re going to have to kind of wait and see a little bit on the data side of things to understand how everything is going to catch up going forward.” Source: https://bio.news/bioeconomy/bio-2025-state-of-emerging-biotechs-report-market-trends/?mkt_tok=NDkwLUVIWi05OTkAAAGb7m5php-rTOf0a_GTaj5pj7Zl-HlpVM25WtyVvCYudM82a9GKjoazUg9sqU66hlAbhqbEuYvcX3C4EqfBG7Q
By Maria Thacker Goethe July 26, 2025
Pioneer Institute has released updated #340B state fact sheets for 2025
By Georgia Bio Admin July 24, 2025
GLS is proud to announce a new partnership with Apprenti This is a key step toward expanding Registered Apprenticeship programs across Georgia’s thriving life sciences sector. July 24, 2025
MORE POSTS