Emerging biotechs get bearish to weather market trends, finds BIO report

By: Clary Estes

“Small companies are the lifeblood of the industry and a lot of what they do, and what they’re experiencing, greatly affects the industry as a whole,” said Chad Wessel, Director of Industry Analysis at the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO).


He spoke with Bio.News in an interview about BIO’s 2025 report, “The State of Emerging Biotech Companies: Investment, Deal, and Pipeline Trends,” focused on the biotech industry from the early-stage perspective. As researchers found, the current landscape is challenging, but there are still opportunities.


“In the last couple years, we’ve had a little bit of a contraction of the industry. During COVID, we kind of had this sugar rush for the industry,” said Wessel. “A lot of companies were being created. A lot of money was being thrown out there. A lot more companies were being funded. And in the last couple of years, there has been a little bit more of a correction, and we’re seeing funding levels going down to what we’ve seen prior to COVID.”


“But when you add on other challenges, like the political landscape and everything, it is leaning towards a very challenging environment for a lot of companies,” he continued.


Bearish venture capital

“In venture capital, yes, you have a lot of money, but it’s going to fewer companies at higher average amounts,” explained Wessel. “It’s creating this competitive haves and have-nots type marketplace or environment. So it just makes it a lot more competitive and more challenging to raise funds.”


Instead of finding new opportunities, venture capitalists are investing more in companies they are already working with. As the BIO report found, the amount of new series A-1 investment rounds into biopharma remained flat between 2023 and 2024, while the number of U.S. companies receiving their first series A-1 tranche went from 102 to 100. This is in comparison to 181 in 2021, reflecting the COVID influx to emerging biotechs.


Comparatively, as the BIO report found, the average amount for A-1 transactions in the U.S. saw a remarkable increase of 700% in the last 15 years, with the average amount raised sitting at $60 million in 2024. The rest of the world stayed relatively steady in comparison to the U.S.’s persistent growth.


And with the more bearish tendencies of investors, Wessel and team observed an interesting trend.


“2024 was the first year that clinical programs actually raised more venture dollars than pre-clinical, which hasn’t happened in a while,” said Wessel. “I think the last time that happened was in 2018. This ties into some of the information that we’ve heard anecdotally, which is that a lot of VC firms are focusing on the companies that they currently have in their portfolio, rather than adding new companies.”


Licensing and deals dip

It is not too surprising, then, that as investors shore up what they already have in the pipelines, the R&D pipeline and licensing have slowed somewhat.


As the BIO report observed, long-term growth in the R&D pipeline continues with an overall growth of 145% since 2010. Yet, the 2024 expansion rate (4.6%) subsided slightly, trailing the 5-year average of 6.7%.


“The growth has slowed on new programs, and more of those programs are being licensed with larger companies,” explained Wessel. “There are fewer options for big companies to backfill their pipeline with products because a lot of them are already out.”


The data also shows a notable slowing of the R&D typically done by large biopharma companies.


“The areas that are not licensed out as much are the ones with some of the higher patient populations and subsequently the ones that are not being run by small companies,” said Wessel. “These are areas like endocrine and cardiovascular diseases, which are areas where there are a lot of things like type 2 diabetes, psoriasis, high blood pressure, etc. Those all have a lot of burden on the healthcare sector or the patient population, and those aren’t really being worked on that much by smaller companies.”


Comparatively – and also not surprisingly – oncology has stayed at the top of the clinical pipeline, along with neurology and infectious disease.


“Same thing with licensing,” said Wessel. “While there are deals that are still happening, the upfront amount is lower currently than it has been in years past, and most of the value is tied up into milestone payments, which may or may not happen.”


This is also being felt when it comes to new companies going public, which has been an oft-discussed challenge in the biotech industry for the last few years.


“The IPO market has still been challenging,” Wessel says. “We went from having 40 companies a year going public, down to 15 in 2023, and now we’re back up in 2025, but it’s still down from the pre-COVID era timeframe.”


Biopharma layoffs

Another notable characteristic of this year’s biopharma landscape has been uptick in layoffs.


“Sometimes it’s just the nature of the economy. But the amount that we’ve seen in the last few years is quite a bit higher,” said Wessel. “To counter that, we don’t really have a way of measuring job creation, but we do know it’s happening. We just are unable to put a value on that.”


The BIO report found that layoff announcements ticked up to 65 during Q1 of 2025. While two points lower than Q1 of the previous year, this still marks a jump from 2024’s Q2, Q3, and Q4, which saw the number of layoff announcements at 41, 54, and 46, respectively.


All in all, Wessel noted, the biotech industry is still in a bit of a holding period when it comes to trying to navigate the coming months.

“It’s too early to be able to say much about the coming years for the industry based on these numbers,” he said. “It takes a little time for reality to kind of catch up for multiple reasons. But what I can say is that we do know that companies are reducing their pipelines. We do know that companies are laying off individuals. We do know that companies are having a challenge of raising funds and continue doing their best to try to maintain operations as long as they can until they can get funds.”


“We know the challenge is out there, but we’re going to have to kind of wait and see a little bit on the data side of things to understand how everything is going to catch up going forward.”


Source: https://bio.news/bioeconomy/bio-2025-state-of-emerging-biotechs-report-market-trends/?mkt_tok=NDkwLUVIWi05OTkAAAGb7m5php-rTOf0a_GTaj5pj7Zl-HlpVM25WtyVvCYudM82a9GKjoazUg9sqU66hlAbhqbEuYvcX3C4EqfBG7Q


November 4, 2026
CEO Note: A New Political Landscape, A Continued Commitment to Georgia Life Sciences Georgia's 2026 election results mark a historic shift in the state's political landscape, setting the stage for a new administration, new statewide leadership, and a potentially changed balance of power in the General Assembly as we approach the 2027 legislative session. At the national level, Democrats won control of both chambers of Congress , creating a new dynamic for federal policymaking. With the presidency remaining under Republican leadership, the coming years will require bipartisan cooperation to advance legislation. Changes in congressional leadership and committee oversight could significantly affect healthcare, federal research funding, FDA policy, drug pricing, and patient access. The most significant changes for our industry, however, are happening here in Georgia. Keisha Lance Bottoms' victory in the gubernatorial race marks a historic transition in state leadership, ending more than two decades of Republican control of the Governor's Office. She will also become the first Black woman elected governor in U.S. history. Democrats also swept Georgia's statewide executive offices , including lieutenant governor, attorney general, secretary of state, and the commissioners responsible for agriculture, labor, and insurance. These leadership changes create new opportunities for engagement on the policies and investments that shape Georgia's economy. In the General Assembly, Democrats made substantial gains and appear positioned to take control of the Georgia House of Representatives , pending final results in several close races. Republicans retained a narrowed majority in the State Senate. This potentially divided legislative environment will require thoughtful engagement and collaboration across party lines. We can also expect considerable turnover in the General Assembly, with dozens of new legislators beginning their terms in January. Along with a new Governor and incoming administration, this creates an important opportunity to introduce policymakers to Georgia's life sciences industry, its economic contributions, and its potential for future growth. What Does This Mean for Georgia's Life Sciences Industry? Life sciences is an economic development priority that should transcend party lines. Our industry's growth depends on a combination of sound public policy, private investment, research, workforce development, infrastructure, and a business environment that encourages innovation and commercialization. As Georgia establishes its new leadership priorities, several areas will be particularly important: Economic Development and Manufacturing: Positioning Georgia to attract and retain biopharmaceutical, biotechnology, and MedTech companies while advancing the infrastructure and capabilities needed to support scale-up manufacturing. Research and Commercialization: Strengthening connections between Georgia's research institutions, emerging companies, investors, and industry partners to move discoveries from the laboratory into commercial applications. Workforce Development: Expanding investment in technical education, apprenticeships, and industry-aligned training to prepare Georgians for the growing range of life sciences careers. Capital and Investment: Improving access to capital and supporting programs that help Georgia-based companies grow, commercialize technologies, and remain competitive. Healthcare Innovation and Patient Access: Supporting an environment that encourages medical innovation, advances research, and improves patient access to new treatments and technologies. These priorities align directly with Pathways & Partnerships: A Roadmap for Georgia's Life Sciences Sector , our ten-year strategy to position Georgia as a leading scale-up manufacturing hub in the Southeast. Georgia enters this transition with both an opportunity and a clear need to strengthen its competitiveness in life sciences. The recently released BIO/TEConomy report highlights the industry's significant contributions, including more than 42,600 jobs across over 4,200 establishments, while reinforcing the opportunity for Georgia to accelerate growth relative to other states. Our Roadmap provides a foundation for working with policymakers to turn these opportunities into sustained investment, stronger industry partnerships, and high-quality jobs throughout Georgia. GLS's Role Moving Forward For Georgia Life Sciences, this transition reinforces the importance of our role as the industry's statewide voice and convener. We will be intentional about building relationships with the incoming administration, new legislative leadership, returning legislators, and state agencies. We must ensure that policymakers understand not only the healthcare implications of our industry, but also its broader economic impact: high-quality jobs, significant research investment, advanced manufacturing, innovation, and opportunities for communities across Georgia. At the federal level, we will continue working with our national partners and Georgia's congressional delegation to advocate for policies that sustain research and innovation, support a predictable regulatory environment, strengthen American biomanufacturing, and advance patient access. With a new administration and many new legislators, we have an opportunity to establish a stronger understanding of what it takes to build and sustain a competitive life sciences ecosystem. That means bringing industry leaders to the table, communicating our priorities, identifying areas of bipartisan alignment, and advocating for policies that support long-term growth. Our industry's success requires a long-term commitment that extends beyond any election cycle or administration. The political landscape may change, but our commitment to advancing Georgia's life sciences industry remains constant. We look forward to working with leaders on both sides of the aisle to ensure Georgia continues to be a place where life sciences companies can innovate, invest, manufacture, and grow.
October 30, 2026
For Georgians living with serious and rare diseases, how quickly and predictably a new treatment moves through U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review can make a real difference. That predictability also matters to the researchers and businesses that make up Georgia’s growing life sciences sector. Both depend in large part on the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), a longstanding bipartisan program that Congress needs to reauthorize by 2027. How PDUFA Works Since 1992, PDUFA has allowed the FDA to collect user fees from biopharmaceutical companies to supplement the agency’s resources for reviewing new medicines. In exchange, the FDA commits to clear, predictable review timelines. The agency’s standards for safety and efficacy remain unchanged. By providing additional resources and establishing clear performance goals, PDUFA helps ensure patients can access new treatments in a more timely and predictable manner. The result of PDUFA have been significant. Before PDUFA, FDA reviews often took more than two years. Today, the median review time is 10 months for standard applications and 8 months for priority applications. In 2025, nearly 70% of new medicines were approved in the U.S. before any other country. What’s at Stake in 2027 Congress reauthorizes PDUFA every five years. The current agreement, PDUFA VII, expires September 30, 2027. Timely reauthorization is critical to maintaining the FDA’s review capacity, preserving regulatory predictability, and ensuring patients continue to benefit from medical innovation. Georgia stakeholders recently came together to talk through what that means here at home. On October 28, Georgia Life Sciences, the MTS Sickle Cell Foundation, and Georgia First hosted “PDUFA: How Medicines Reach People,” a lunch-and-learn at Brookhaven City Centre. Patient advocates, congressional staff, and business and academic leaders heard from Nick Magallanes of Todd Strategy Group, Natalie Crawford of Georgia First, Maria Thacker-Goethe of Georgia Life Sciences, and Mapillar Dahn of the MTS Sickle Cell Foundation. What We Heard At the event, speakers came at PDUFA from different angles, but the common thread was how the program affects Georgians. Mapillar Dahn of the MTS Sickle Cell Foundation stressed that patients need to remain at the center of conversations. As a mother of three daughters with Sickle Cell Disease, Mapillar stressed that she wants the FDA to have what it needs to carry out a thorough review without unnecessary delays. The confidence families place in a treatment depends in part on confidence in that process. Natalie Crawford with Georgia First and Mended Hearts spoke about the need for a fully resourced FDA so that Georgia patients have access to innovative treatments and also for a healthy Georgia economy. Additionally, Maria Thacker-Goethe spoke to what PDUFA reauthorization means for Georgia’s booming life sciences sector. She warned that without PDUFA reauthorization, research across the board will be stifled – ranging from devastating impacts to small startups to significant delays in investments and research. Part of a National Conversation As Congress prepares for the 2027 reauthorization, conversations like these help bring together patients, advocates, and community leaders to highlight the real-world importance of the program. Decisions made in this reauthorization cycle will shape FDA resources and review timelines nationwide. By reauthorizing PDUFA on time, Congress can make sure the FDA can keep reviewing new medicines efficiently and patients in Georgia and across the country can get the treatments they need. 
October 29, 2026
New Hypepotamus feature explores Georgia’s growing MedTech sector and opportunities to strengthen startup development, commercialization, and long-term industry growth Georgia’s life sciences industry is experiencing significant growth, fueled by major investments, expanding research capabilities, and an increasingly connected innovation ecosystem. From biotechnology and medical devices to diagnostics and digital health, the state continues to demonstrate its potential as a destination for life sciences innovation. As Georgia builds on that momentum, an important opportunity is emerging: ensuring that the startups and technologies developed here have the resources and support to grow, scale, and remain in the state. A new Hypepotamus feature, “Atlanta’s MedTech Momentum Faces a Test: Can Startups Stay and Scale?” , by Maija Ehlinger, explores this next phase of ecosystem development. Featuring perspectives from entrepreneurs, investors, and industry leaders, including Georgia Life Sciences President & CEO Maria Thacker Goethe, the article examines how Georgia can build on its existing strengths while addressing challenges facing emerging companies. A Strong Foundation for Continued Growth Georgia has made substantial progress in establishing itself as a competitive life sciences hub. Recent major investment announcements, including UCB’s planned $2 billion biologics manufacturing facility in Gwinnett County and Shriners Children’s planned investment of more than $153 million in a research institute at Science Square, reflect continued confidence in the state's capabilities and potential. The state also benefits from a strong network of research universities, healthcare systems, entrepreneurial support organizations, and innovative companies developing technologies that have the potential to improve patient care and advance medical discovery. Programs and facilities such as Georgia Tech's ATDC, BioSpark Labs, and other regional innovation resources provide important support for emerging companies, helping entrepreneurs move promising ideas toward commercial application. These assets represent a strong foundation for future growth. Addressing the Needs of a Maturing Ecosystem While Georgia's industry continues to advance, emerging MedTech and biotechnology companies face challenges that extend well beyond the state. A changing investment environment, increasingly complex commercialization pathways, and demand for specialized infrastructure are reshaping how early-stage companies develop and grow. The Hypepotamus article highlights some of these pressures, including the recent closure of Portal Innovations' Atlanta location and the challenges startups encounter in securing affordable laboratory space, early-stage capital, and industry connections. These developments underscore the importance of strengthening the support systems that enable innovation. They also reflect a broader opportunity for Georgia to build on its progress and ensure that companies at every stage of development can access the resources they need. “Our biggest opportunity is to become as good at growing and retaining life sciences companies as we are at attracting major investments,” said Thacker Goethe in the article. A Roadmap for Georgia’s Next Chapter This focus on growing and retaining innovative companies is central to Georgia Life Sciences' 10-year strategic roadmap , which outlines priorities to strengthen the state's life sciences ecosystem and long-term competitiveness. The roadmap recognizes that continued industry growth requires a coordinated approach to commercialization, access to capital, specialized infrastructure, workforce development, and partnerships across academia, industry, healthcare, and government. For early-stage companies, those connections are especially important. Access to research facilities, clinical partners, experienced mentors, investors, and manufacturing resources can make the difference between a promising discovery and a successful commercial enterprise. Through its industry councils, strategic partnerships, and ecosystem initiatives, Georgia Life Sciences is working to help strengthen these connections and support the development of an environment where companies can succeed at every stage of growth. Turning Momentum into Long-Term Opportunity Georgia's life sciences story is one of substantial progress and considerable opportunity. The next chapter will require building on that success with the same intentionality that has helped attract major industry investments and expand the state's research and innovation capabilities. That means continuing to support companies choosing Georgia for major investments while also strengthening the pathways that allow homegrown businesses to develop, commercialize, and scale here. The goal is not simply to attract life sciences innovation to Georgia, but to ensure Georgia is a place where innovation can take root, grow, and thrive. The Hypepotamus feature offers a timely perspective on the opportunities ahead and the importance of continued collaboration across Georgia's life sciences community.  Read the Full Hypepotamus Article
MORE POSTS