Alzheimer’s patient groups protest U.S. Medicare coverage proposal limiting use of new drugs

Alzheimer’s patient groups, disappointed by Medicare’s plan to sharply limit coverage of new drugs for the brain-wasting disease, are planning publicity and lobbying campaigns to protest a proposal they say could delay their use for 10 years.

“Congress has to know how bad this will be for patients,” said John Dwyer, president of Global Alzheimer’s Platform Foundation (GAP) advocacy group.

In  a preliminary decision  last week, the U.S. Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS), which runs the government health plan for people age 65 and older, said it would cover Biogen Inc’s  (BIIB.O)  already approved Aduhelm, and similar Alzheimer’s disease treatments in development, only for patients enrolled in approved clinical trials.Report ad

That plan would severely limit the number of patients receiving the treatment, undercutting the Food and Drug Administration’s accelerated approval of Aduhelm for patients in the early stages of the memory-robbing condition.

The public disagreement over the drug’s use is unusual for the agencies, both part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Alzheimer’s Association Chief Executive Harry Johns said Medicare’s plan “usurps FDA’s role in drug approvals,” calling it “an unprecedented and terrible draft decision.”Report ad

His group, as well as UsAgainstAlzheimer’s and GAP – three of the biggest Alzheimer patient organizations – said they plan to fight the decision by appealing to lawmakers, the Biden administration and the U.S. Health Secretary.

The Alzheimer’s Association said it is using “all avenues of communication” to make its case.

Biogen is also fighting the decision and in a statement said it is “supportive of the community in raising their voices on this important issue of access.”Report ad

The Medicare agency could alter its plan before it is finalized in April, but it is unclear what new evidence or facts would cause it to soften its stance.

“There are only two clinical studies … There isn’t any real-world experience to convince CMS,” said James Chambers, a researcher at the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health at Tufts Medical Center in Boston. “They will receive a lot of outrage as opposed to new information.”

Medicare has opened a 30-day comment period with a final decision due by April 11.

“If the (CMS) decision changes, it will be because of political pressure,” said Raymond James analyst Chris Meekins.

CONTROVERSIAL DECISION

The FDA’s  June decision  was the first approval of an Alzheimer’s drug in nearly two decades, but was a controversial one not supported by the agency’s outside advisers. It relied on evidence that the drug can reduce amyloid brain plaques, a likely contributor to Alzheimer’s, rather than proof that it slows progression of the disease.

Only one of Biogen’s two large-scale trials showed that Aduhelm had an impact on cognition.

The three Alzheimer’s patient groups said Medicare’s plan unfairly penalizes people with the disease – probably because there are so many of them and the cost could be enormous.

Aduhelm’s price – cut recently to $28,200 from $56,000 per year – sparked concerns about Medicare’s budget since Alzheimer’s is an age-related disease and around 85% of people eligible for the drug are in the government plan.

The number of Americans with Alzheimer’s is expected to rise to 13 million by 2050 from more than 6 million currently. Biogen has estimated that around 1 million would currently be eligible for Aduhelm.

Other companies, including Biogen partner Eisai Co Ltd and Eli Lilly and Co  (LLY.N) , also are pursuing accelerated approval from the FDA for similar medications.

“This decision was not about Aduhelm alone. This was a decision about drugs still in trials,” said UsAgainstAlzheimer’s chairman George Vradenburg. “It is stunning preemption.”

Medicare typically pays for FDA-authorized medications, but by law is required to cover only products and services deemed “reasonable and necessary” for diagnosis or treatment.

Vradenburg said his organization is “communicating with Congress and the Biden Administration” about its dismay.

December 22, 2025
Dear Georgia Life Sciences Community, As we reflect on the past year, I want to extend my sincere thanks to our Georgia Life Sciences members for making it such an impactful one. Your engagement and leadership continue to move our industry forward and advance our shared strategic priorities— driving strong policy, expanding the talent pipeline, and creating intentional spaces for collaboration across Georgia’s life sciences ecosystem. Our Year in Review captures the progress we’ve made together across these priorities and highlights the collective impact our members are having statewide—from strengthening the workforce and supporting manufacturing growth to elevating Georgia’s position as a national life sciences leader. This progress is only possible because of the collaboration, commitment, and insight of our member community. 
By Maria Thacker Goethe December 20, 2025
The biopharmaceutical industry is growing America’s manufacturing and R&D capabilities to develop the next generation of treatments. A recent study from PILMA quantified the impact of the industry’s investment in American infrastructure on the economy and union workforce across 18 states from 2019-2024. The study found that across the 18 states included, the biopharmaceutical industry: Supported the American economy by investing $86.5B in R&D and manufacturing infrastructure and developing 1000+ construction projects at over 700 distinct facilities. Strengthened the American workforce by generating $2.6B in skilled union wages and providing $19M in support for union apprenticeships. The impact of the biopharmaceutical industry’s investment in American manufacturing and union jobs extends beyond direct benefits, spurring additional economic activity in the communities where workers live. This is known as the multiplier effect . On average, every $1 of new investment in a U.S. biopharmaceutical manufacturing facilities generates an additional $1.59 in further economic activity (2.59x times the initial investment value). The industry’s $86.5B investment in R&D and manufacturing infrastructure has a total economic impact of $224B. Check out this resource to learn more about how biopharmaceutical investment in American infrastructure supports America’s workers and communities. For more on how biopharmaceutical companies are investing in America’s future, visit innovation.org/america-investment .
December 10, 2025
Georgia Life Sciences has joined 43 state and regional life sciences organizations in signing a national Council of State Bioscience Associations (CSBA) letter calling on Congress to take immediate action on three bipartisan policy priorities that are essential to sustaining U.S. leadership in biomedical innovation and supporting patients nationwide. With Congress back in session and several critical programs at risk of expiring, the letter urges congressional leaders to advance the following provisions without delay: 1. Reauthorize the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher (PPRV) Program The PPRV program has been instrumental in incentivizing the development of therapies for children with rare and life-threatening conditions. Its lapse threatens to slow or halt research that families across the country are counting on. 2. Extend the SBIR/STTR Programs The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs provide crucial early-stage capital for emerging biotech and medtech companies—many of them in Georgia. Without reauthorization, hundreds of innovative small businesses face uncertainty, jeopardizing new therapies, diagnostics, and technologies in the pipeline, 3. Advance PBM Transparency Reforms Greater transparency and accountability within pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) practices are needed to ensure that savings reach patients and employers. Reforming PBM operations is essential to strengthening access and affordability across the healthcare system. A Unified Message from the Life Sciences Community The sign-on letter reflects broad, bipartisan alignment across the national life sciences ecosystem: researchers, entrepreneurs, investors, patient advocates, and state associations all share a common message— these programs underpin America’s global competitiveness and are vital to patients who rely on continued scientific progress. Georgia Life Sciences has shared the letter with members of Georgia’s congressional delegation and will continue engaging with policymakers to emphasize the importance of swift action.
MORE POSTS